Appeal court rules UK govt's Rwanda asylum plan unlawful
Asylum seekers from Libya arrive in Rwanda in December 2020. UK high court judges were on Monday due to rule on challenges to the British government's controversial policy of deporting migrants and asylum-seekers to Rwanda. PHOTO | FILE | NMG
What you need to know:
- Rwanda has a record of crushing political dissent and free speech under President Paul Kagame, who has been de facto leader since the end of the 1994 genocide.
The Rwandan government said Thursday it remained committed to a British plan to send asylum seekers to the African country despite a ruling by the UK's Court of Appeal that the scheme was unlawful.
"Rwanda remains fully committed to making this partnership work," government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo told AFP.
"While this is ultimately a decision for the UK's judicial system, we do take issue with the ruling that Rwanda is not a safe country for asylum seekers and refugees."
The Court of Appeal judges said in their ruling that "unless deficiencies" in Rwanda's asylum system were corrected, "removal of asylum seekers to Rwanda will be unlawful".
Former British prime minister Boris Johnson brought in the proposal to try to tackle record numbers of migrants crossing the Channel from northern France by small boats.
But it triggered a wave of protests from rights groups and charities, while last-gasp legal challenges successfully blocked the first deportation flights in June last year.
Makolo insisted that Rwanda was "one of the safest countries in the world" and said "we have been recognised by the UNHCR and other international institutions for our exemplary treatment of refugees".
"As a society, and as a government, we have built a safe, secure, dignified environment, in which migrants and refugees have equal rights and opportunities as Rwandans. Everyone relocated here under this partnership will benefit from this," she added.
"When the migrants do arrive, we will welcome them and provide them with the support they'll need to build new lives in Rwanda."
Rwanda has a record of crushing political dissent and free speech under President Paul Kagame, who has been de facto leader since the end of the 1994 genocide.
Frank Habineza, leader of the opposition Democratic Green Party of Rwanda, hailed the UK court ruling.
"It has vindicated us because we were being accused of being against national interest because we opposed the sending of asylum seekers to Rwanda from the UK," he told AFP.
Habineza said the scheme was "abusing the fundamental rights of the asylum seeker" because they were being "forced" to go to Rwanda.
