Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Former PS Ssali, MPs accused of corruption released on bail 

Left to right: MPs Michael Mawanda, Paul Akamba, lawyer Julius Kirya, ex-Ministry of Trade PS Geraldine Ssali and Elgon MP Ignitius Mudimi Wamakuyu in the dock during the hearing of their case at the Anti-Corruption Court in Kampala on August 27, 2024. PHOTO | ABUBAKER LUBOWA

What you need to know:

  • The three were granted a cash bail of Shs35 million each by the Anti-Corruption Court Judge Jane Okuo Kajuga who also ordered them to deposit their passports with court

Igara East MP Michael Mawanda, his Busiki counterpart Paul Akamba and city lawyer Julius Kirya Taitankoko who are accused of defrauding government Shs3.4 billion which was intended to compensate Buyaka Growers Cooperative Society Ltd  for property lost during war have been released on bail.
The three were granted a cash bail of Shs35 million each by the Anti-Corruption Court Judge Jane Okuo Kajuga who also ordered them to deposit their passports with court.
Ms Kajuga barred the accused from leaving the country without court’s permission. Each of their sureties was bonded Shs50 million not cash.

 During court proceedings, the state attorney had expressed fear that the MPs and their co-accused would interfere in police investigations. However, the judge said that since investigations were complete, their trial would start soon given that they have been on remand for over two months.


The same court also granted Ms Geraldine Ssali, the former Permanent Secretary in the Ministry of Trade, a temporary release on bail. Ssali who had spent 42 days on remand was given the same bail conditions as her co-accused.

In her ruling, Judge Kajuga stated that it would be unjust to keep Ssali in remand, as the state had not commenced asset recovery proceedings during her time in detention. The court also found the sureties to be substantial, with a good balance of funds on their bank accounts and a fixed place of abode.